One of the beautiful aspects of a free market system is choice. In a free market economy you can choose which grocery store to buy from, which movies to see, and what car to buy. Not only can you choose which companies to do business with, you can choose which to avoid. Let’s not debate the merits of Unions. I’m comfortable with agreeing to disagree that Unions are destroying the spirit of innovation that helped make America great. This has never been a problem in the past because freedom-loving individualists have had the ability to choose a Union-made automobile or a non-Union alternative. That choice is now gone. We may not be forced to buy Union cars (yet), but we are forced to support the Unions with our tax dollars. Now, even if you buy a small foreign car with great gas mileage, you can take comfort in the fact that you are also paying for a vehicle you purposely chose to avoid. You may not agree with my positions, but do you really believe it is fair to force every American to support Unions? This is the path we are now walking. All Americans will be forced to support causes whether they agree or disagree. |
Our tax dollars are now contributing to disastrous corporate strategies. Are you happy about paying for CEO golden parachutes? Nobody cares what you think, you are now supporting the cause of keeping failed CEO’s in the lifestyle they are accustomed to. Are you a proponent of Detroit’s strategy of an SUV in every driveway? Your representatives no longer care about your opinion, your tax dollars will be paying for that failed business mistake for years to come.
Whether your cause of choice is corrupt politicians funneling money to Unions, wooden arrows, Wallstreet, ACORN, or CEO compensation packages – congratulations, you and every other American are now contributors to the cause. Were you smart enough to realize Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Ford, GM, Chrysler, and countless banks were terrible investments? Tough, you now own a piece or are financing all of them. Plus, you have the added benefit of typical government incompetence in managing your hard earned tax dollars, they have already lost track of $300 billion of your money. $300 billion here, $300 billion there, pretty soon this is going to get expensive. |
The loss of choice just one sad consequence of allowing government to grow in power, size, and intrusiveness. There once was a time when you could pick and choose the products you buy, the causes you support, the companies you invest in, and the charities you wish to donate to. You are now being robbed of that ability to choose. Now, you will be forced to give until it hurts to any cause or company politicians have deemed beneficial to their own self-interest. |
Welcome to the new America: less choice, more government. |

The unions might be good for the people who are in the unions but it doesn’t do a thing for the people who are unemployed. Because the union keeps down the number of jobs, it doesn’t do a thing for them. -Milton Friedman
Our tax dollars are now contributing to disastrous corporate strategies. Are you happy about paying for CEO golden parachutes? Nobody cares what you think, you are now supporting the cause of keeping failed CEO’s in the lifestyle they are accustomed to. Are you a proponent of Detroit’s strategy of an SUV in every driveway? Your representatives no longer care about your opinion, your tax dollars will be paying for that failed business mistake for years to come.
The loss of choice just one sad consequence of allowing government to grow in power, size, and intrusiveness. There once was a time when you could pick and choose the products you buy, the causes you support, the companies you invest in, and the charities you wish to donate to. You are now being robbed of that ability to choose. Now, you will be forced to give until it hurts to any cause or company politicians have deemed beneficial to their own self-interest.
Welcome to the new America: less choice, more government.
Union workers didn’t run the car companies into the ground.
So Bush is a socialist?
Is that your argument? Thirty years of cutting regulations (I do not exclude Clinton from this) and the result is an economic collapse spawning socialism?
LOL!
Pro-UAW: It doesn’t matter who failed. The issue I am bringing up is that I didn’t choose to invest in the Big 3. Now I am being forced to invest.
I am personally opposed to Unionized labor forces, should I be forced to support Unions financially?
Rewinn: Clinton, Bush, and Obama have something in common. They all believe in the expansion of government.
“So Bush is a socialist?” Who knows the ideology that he truly believes in. From the actions he has taken during his 8 year reign, it could be argued that he most closely aligns with National Socialists.
“Thirty years of cutting regulations…” If your definition of cutting regulations means that businesses face less regulation today than they did 30 years ago — you are crazy!
Bureaucrats like to blame the fabled reduced regulation on today’s problems. This mass deception suits government interests. Government has failed us, and now they want more money and more power to fix the problems they have caused.
Our economic crisis is a result of monetary policy. Peter Schiff, an economic adviser that foresaw the problems we have now, was laughed at when he predicted the current crisis. Here are some video clips from over a year ago: http://video.google.com/videosearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=peter+schiff+was+right&um=1&sa=N&tab=wv&oi=property_suggestions&resnum=0&ct=property-revision&cd=1#
When someone publish something like this i must admit that i need to say: thank you. I also read some other posts and i must say this is a very cool blog. I added this blog to my favourites list.
Just believed i would comment and say neat theme, did you code it yourself? Looks terrific.